The research study should be entirely original and should not be published or undergoing evaluation elsewhere. It has to explicitly define a research gap and make a significant and original contribution to the body of knowledge.
The authors are expected to adhere to ethical standards that are set by such organizations like Committee on Publication Ethics, and no plagiarism, falsification, fabrication of data or submissions of duplicated works.
The plagiarism level in the manuscript must not exceed 15 %, and all copied ideas, text, or data should be referred to in order to prevent academic dishonesty.
The problem statement and clear research objectives should be well defined. The research ought to articulate the importance of the problem and the particular objectives that are being met.
The methodology proposed should have a sound scientific basis, be well described and replicated. It must contain a description of models, algorithms or structure applied to the study in detail.
The paper should be formatted according to the requirements of the standard journals and should have a properly structured format, beginning with the abstract and ending with references.
It must be composed in clear and formal academic language and proper grammar; coherence and logical flow are required to make the manuscript readable and professional.
Effective peer review response is important that authors should thoroughly revise all the comments given by the reviewers with clear point by point responses and should improve the paper by making the required amendments to improve the quality of the paper.
The submissions that fail to meet the above-mentioned rules and regulations, such as originality, ethics, formatting and quality requirements, will be rejected during the first screening process without being subject to any further review or peer assessment. It is highly recommended that authors should make every effort to follow instructions to the letter prior to submission.